20:00:50 <cait> #startmeeting Koha General IRC Meeting 13 January 2016 20:00:50 <huginn`> Meeting started Wed Jan 13 20:00:50 2016 UTC. The chair is cait. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:50 <huginn`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:00:50 <huginn`> The meeting name has been set to 'koha_general_irc_meeting_13_january_2016' 20:00:51 <JesseM> :) coffee 20:00:58 <cait> Welcome all! 20:01:07 <cait> today's agenda is at http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/General_IRC_meeting_13_January_2016 20:01:16 <cait> #link http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/General_IRC_meeting_13_January_2016 20:01:21 <cait> #topic Introductions 20:01:22 <wahanui> #info wahanui, a bot that has become sentient 20:01:35 <cait> please introduce yourself like wahanui just did, using #info 20:01:56 <JesseM> #info Jesse Maseto - ByWater, USA 20:01:56 <blou> #blou, a bot not quite so sentient 20:01:57 <BobB> #info Bob Birchall, Calyx, Australia 20:02:03 <bag> #info Brendan Gallagher - ByWater Solutions 20:02:04 <Colinc> #info Colin Campbell, ptfs-europe 20:02:04 <drojf> #info Mirko Tietgen, Berlin, Germany 20:02:13 <blou> #info Philippe Blouin, inLibro 20:02:13 <cait> #info Katrin Fischer, BSZ, Germany 20:02:13 <khall> #info Kyle Hall, ByWater Solutions 20:02:14 <Joubu> #info Jonathan Druart, UK 20:02:15 <hbraum> #info Heather Braum, NEKLS/NExpress, Lawrence, KS, USA 20:02:20 <andreashm> #info Andreas Hedström Mace, Stockholm University Library 20:02:20 <jmsasse> #info Joel Sasse Plum Creek, USA 20:02:34 <cait> :) 20:02:37 <cait> nice! 20:02:48 <rangi> #info Chris Cormack, Catalyst IT, NZ 20:03:19 <barton_kohameeting> #info Barton Chittenden, BWS, Louisville KY USA 20:03:33 <cait> ok, let's move on to our first topic for tonight :) 20:03:40 <cait> #topic Announcements 20:04:00 <cait> anyony any announcements? 20:04:10 <tubaclarinet> #info Christopher Davis, Uintah County Library, Utah, USA 20:04:12 <cait> anyone... 20:04:13 <wahanui> anyone is free to organize one at any time :-) 20:04:14 <rangi> next week is the group work for the academy 20:04:43 <rangi> please add the keyword Academy in the keyword field to any bugs that you think might be ok for them to look at 20:05:07 <cait> #info next week is group work week for the academy at Catalyst IT - please add the academy keyword to any bugs you think would be ok for them to look at 20:05:20 <cait> ok = not too hard to fix? 20:05:35 <rangi> yeah, preferably don't touch the db ;) 20:05:42 <cait> :) 20:05:53 <cait> anything else? 20:05:54 <wahanui> anything else is just being crap 20:05:59 <drojf> i got feedback for the pre-kohacon meeting in berlin. there is only one short day now (thursday) 20:06:00 <rangi> but id rather have more, even if we go, oh thats too hard, than have only a few to pick from 20:06:02 <bag> are there currently any that are marked? 20:06:03 <rangi> if that makes sense 20:06:05 <rangi> yep 20:06:16 <Joubu> rangi: to signoff, submit a patch or both? 20:06:19 <rangi> if you do a search in bugs for that keyword, you will find them ;) 20:06:23 <rangi> Joubu: both please 20:06:24 <wahanui> rumour has it both is best :) 20:06:33 <Joubu> rangi: ok great :) 20:07:00 <cait> #info Pre-KohaCon meeting in Berlin has room secured - only one short day now (Thursday) 20:07:27 <cait> moving on? 20:07:53 <drojf> there may be a catmandu workshop 20:07:58 <cait> :) 20:08:00 <drojf> or in greece, depends 20:08:07 <bag> :) 20:08:48 <cait> moving on! 20:08:50 <cait> #topic Update on releases 20:08:57 <andreashm> oh catmandu 20:08:58 <wahanui> it has been said that catmandu is pretty super awesome 20:09:07 <cait> jajm, wizzyrea, fredericd? bag? 20:09:35 <bag> I have some - should I go first? 20:09:38 <rangi> i think wizzyrea is still on the bus 20:09:50 <cait> yep please start bag 20:09:55 <bag> Jenkins (once tcohen is back in the office I will spend sometime with him so we can get master stable again) 20:10:16 <bag> I am really interested in XSS patches from Joubu ( needs QA http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13618 ) 20:10:17 <huginn`> 04Bug 13618: enhancement, P5 - low, ---, jonathan.druart, Signed Off , Prevent XSS in the Staff Client and the OPAC 20:10:36 <bag> qa team that would be awesome if we nudge that along 20:10:49 <cait> I am on it, I think it's pretty close now 20:10:56 <khall> excellent! 20:10:57 <bag> sweet 20:11:13 <bag> Change in the wording on the bug (when changing the status to pushed to master). I want to put (Pushed to Master - Should be in the May 2016 release) - any objections? 20:11:13 <wahanui> bag: that doesn't look right 20:11:19 <Joubu> bag: it's a very hard one, cait found bugs when I was sure there were not... 20:11:19 <irma> #info Irma, CALYX Sydney : sorry I am late 20:11:39 <Joubu> bag: we will certainly found some others when pushed 20:12:04 <bag> yeah Joubu I think there are going to be some - I will be cautious when pushing - but would like that early early in the release cycle :) 20:12:05 <Joubu> but at least if it's pushed not to close to the release, we will have time to get them! 20:12:06 <rangi> nope 20:12:17 <Joubu> :) 20:12:36 <rangi> that was nope to bag, no objections to changing the text 20:12:49 <rangi> not nope to that bag ;-) 20:13:22 <Joubu> bag: yep good idea 20:13:23 <bag> cool it was brought to my attention that it was sort of hard to go back a few years and see a message “that was pushed to master” but when? heh 20:13:46 <bag> currently my goal is to keep the PQA queue low 20:13:48 <rangi> dont forget you have the release notes text area now too 20:13:59 <Joubu> when you have it, but you don't know where :) 20:13:59 <bag> Patches - it's all fair game now. Anything that is passed QA is a candidate to be pushed 20:14:29 <bag> we also Created Elastic Search branch for easy testing. ( http://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/new_12478_elasticsearch ) 20:14:40 <bag> bug 12478 20:14:41 <huginn`> 04Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12478 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, robin, NEW , Elasticsearch support for Koha 20:14:59 <Joubu> master is quite unstable at the moment, but we have patches in the queue 20:15:16 <Joubu> (I don't have the numbers, sorry) 20:15:19 <bag> it’s pretty close to master and I will work on trying to make sure that branch is close to current 20:16:00 <bag> yes it’s unstable - I want to work on that in the next couple of weeks. I was waiting for tcohen to come back so I can learn more about Jenkins - then I’m sure we’ll have some spots to attack 20:16:11 <bag> would be great to get it stable 20:16:28 <Joubu> Why is the branch called new? 20:16:47 <cait1> test 20:16:47 <Joubu> it is the same as the one on the catalyst repo, right? 20:16:52 <cait1> sorry, i lost connection to IRC 20:16:55 <cait1> reading back now quickly 20:17:10 <Joubu> (rebased I meant) 20:17:11 <bag> hmmm something to do with how gmcharlt_ set up the permissions 20:17:35 <bag> yes it is the same as the catalyst repo currently 20:17:38 <rangi> i think you need to get your nick back before you can continue the meeting cait1 20:17:59 <cait1> hm already exists 20:18:02 <cait1> we need to kill the othe rcait 20:18:07 <rangi> we cant 20:18:14 <cait1> ugh 20:18:17 <rangi> it needs to timeout/fall off 20:18:22 <rangi> we can only kick it from the channel 20:18:27 <rangi> which doesn't actually help 20:18:30 <bag> yeah whoops 20:18:31 <rangi> the nick still exists 20:18:32 <rangi> :) 20:18:43 <drojf> you can kill it if you have a password 20:18:52 <cait1> hm let me try to remember 20:19:11 <cait1> and +1 for adding the expected version to the RM push notes on bugs 20:19:22 <cait> ok back :) 20:19:48 <bag> ok that’s really it from me. any questions? 20:19:55 <cait> #info XSS patches on bug 13618 should be pushed soon - will have all to look out for bugs 20:19:56 <huginn`> 04Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13618 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, jonathan.druart, Signed Off , Prevent XSS in the Staff Client and the OPAC 20:20:13 <cait> i got 2 things i already told while disconnected (noone saw) :) 20:20:14 <cait> sec 20:20:29 <cait> bug 15358 20:20:30 <huginn`> 04Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15358 blocker, P1 - high, ---, julian.maurice, Needs Signoff , merge.pl does not populate values to merge 20:20:45 <bag> yes saw that - it’s a blocker 20:20:46 <Joubu> that's a bad on 20:20:50 <cait> bug 6657 20:20:51 <huginn`> 04Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6657 critical, P5 - low, ---, jonathan.druart, Needs Signoff , Making 999 visible in framework duplicates 999 entry and affects index 20:20:58 <bag> I’ll ask nick to test that 20:20:59 <cait> Are in need for good testing and speedy sign-off please 20:21:08 <bag> khall: can you ask nick to take a look at that one? 20:21:18 <khall> will do! 20:21:19 <cait> so we can get that fixed for the next maintenance releases 20:21:34 <bag> hmm maybe both of those khall 20:21:42 <cait> authority merge and authority add broken 20:21:44 <khall> can do 20:22:01 <Joubu> There is bug 15568 too 20:22:02 <huginn`> 04Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15568 major, P5 - low, ---, jonathan.druart, Needs Signoff , Circ rules are not displayed anymore 20:22:19 <Joubu> (which is not really major) 20:22:24 <khall> on the list 20:22:31 <bag> cool 20:23:01 <cait> #info please help with good testing and speedy sign off for evil bugs: 15358, 6657 (authorities) and 15568 (admin) 20:23:14 <cait> anything else? 20:23:14 <wahanui> hmmm... anything else is just being crap 20:23:29 <bag> also I am completely open to anyone that has ideas on promotion of more sign-offers :) 20:23:52 <bag> I am working on getting more bywater peeps to do sign-offs (getting the right tools inplace first) 20:24:28 <cait> i think one problem is that we have a lot of hard to test things - architecture and internals 20:24:32 <Joubu> bug 15570 affects stable releases 20:24:33 <huginn`> 04Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15570 major, P5 - low, ---, jonathan.druart, Needs Signoff , circ/renew.pl is broken 20:24:41 <bag> and will be putting an appeal to the librarians that work with bywater 20:25:45 <cait> :) 20:26:26 <cait> bag: maybe organizing a test day like lyon did could help 20:26:35 <cait> helping people to set up sandboxes for bugs they have picked before 20:26:38 <bag> cool :) noted 20:27:06 <cait> ok, one last thing :) 20:27:15 <andreashm> setting up sandboxes sounds like a good wau to make sign-offs easier 20:27:24 <bag> once I am not traveling so much - I’ll be trying some virtual “help” too 20:27:28 <tubaclarinet> I know there's <http://bywatersolutions.com/2013/11/29/koha-sandboxes/> but a video of it would be stellar! 20:27:45 <cait> hm a tutorial video is a good idea! 20:28:08 <cait> #idea create a tutorial video about setting up a sandbox, testing and signing off with it 20:28:10 <barton> nengard has been looking at 'guide on the side' for training/documentation purposes, but I think that we could use it for testing as well 20:28:21 <bag> cool I’ll ask nicole to create a video 20:28:31 <cait> #idea organize a test day where libraries can pick bugs to test before and help them testing them (setting up sandboxes, fixing conflicts) 20:28:39 <barton> +1 for video 20:28:46 <cait> a webinar might work too 20:29:01 <tubaclarinet> Please include in the video troubleshooting like symptoms of the wrong database, etc. 20:29:17 <tubaclarinet> FWIW 20:29:24 <cait> maybe we could add an faq section to the wiki page 20:29:28 <barton> good idea tubaclarinet. 20:29:29 <cait> about problems 20:29:39 <cait> if you see... ... that did not work, because... 20:29:54 <tubaclarinet> faq section = :-) 20:30:11 <cait> some other thing I'd like to get done - ashimema has volunteered to join the QA team again (yay!) - so i'd like to do a quick vote to see if we can make this happen :) 20:30:36 <bag> +1 20:30:37 <cait> #startvote Are you ok with ashimema joining the QA team for 3.24? (yes,no) 20:30:37 <huginn`> Begin voting on: Are you ok with ashimema joining the QA team for 3.24? Valid vote options are , yes, no, . 20:30:37 <huginn`> Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 20:30:52 <cait> #vote yes 20:30:57 <Joubu> #vote yes 20:31:00 <davidnind> #vote yes 20:31:02 <khall> #vote yes 20:31:05 <barton> #vote yes 20:31:05 <drojf> #vote yes 20:31:11 <jmsasse> #vote yes 20:31:12 <bag> #vote yes 20:31:19 <hbraum> #vote yes 20:31:32 <BobB> #vote Yes 20:31:53 <cait> ending vote... 20:32:02 <cait> #endvote 20:32:02 <huginn`> Voted on "Are you ok with ashimema joining the QA team for 3.24?" Results are 20:32:02 <huginn`> yes (10): Joubu, davidnind, cait, jmsasse, barton, BobB, khall, bag, hbraum, drojf 20:32:03 <Colinc> #vote yes 20:32:15 <andreashm> #vore yes 20:32:22 <andreashm> ah, damn, to late 20:32:35 <andreashm> and misspelled. =) 20:32:53 <cait> #agreed Martin Renvoize joins the QA team for 3.24 - 12 yes votes 20:33:01 <cait> moving on to the next? 20:33:02 <bag> nice 20:33:15 <cait> #topic Comments on Circ Rules Revamp 20:33:35 <bag> khall ^^^ 20:33:44 <cait> #link http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Circulation_Rules_Interface_and_Backend_Revamp_RFC 20:34:10 <khall> We'd really like to nail down any issues with the circ rules revamp if there are any 20:34:24 <khall> anyone who is interested please read the rfc 20:34:36 <khall> if you've already read it and have any questions now, I'm here to field them 20:34:53 <tubaclarinet> rfc = request for comment? 20:35:00 <bag> yes 20:35:09 <khall> I think this is very important in the long term as our movement to increasing amounts of circ rules has maid the current interface untenable 20:35:15 <cait> I think i am slightly in favour of a more table like thing ot be honest 20:35:22 <cait> but that's me 20:35:43 <indradg> #info Indranil Das Gupta, India. 20:35:49 <khall> cait: we already have a table like thing ; ) The primary goal is to move to a more flexible approach that allows for simpler rule sets 20:35:56 <cait> I'd like something where I can easily compare rules for different itemtypes or different categories 20:35:59 <khall> this approach doesn't jive all that well with a table based approach 20:36:03 <Joubu> I think we need oleonard :) 20:36:09 <khall> cait: that's already on my list! 20:36:20 <cait> i am not sure how that would work with the mock up 20:36:23 <ikourmou> #info Giannis Kourmoulis, Thessaloniki Greece 20:36:49 <khall> I think a second screen that gives a matrix of types categories and libraries with what the rule will be ( and where that rule is coming from ) would be a good companion 20:36:59 <andreashm> I have read the RFC... I'm a bit concerned that having a lot of issuing rules will make this new appoach hard to overview 20:37:02 <BobB> indradg it must be early for you! 20:37:18 <BobB> like middle of the night? 20:37:20 <andreashm> khall: that seems like a good approach 20:37:22 <khall> andreashm: that is what the second screen I propose will take care of 20:37:43 <khall> thanks! 20:37:44 <indradg> BobB: 2:10 am 20:37:58 <BobB> :) well done! 20:38:09 <barton> cait -- how would you feel about some sort of explicit 'compare circ rules' functionality? 20:38:11 <cait> khall: could youmaybe mock up the second screen too? 20:38:26 <cait> to get a better idea? 20:38:29 <hbraum> my consortia is sponsoring this development, although i’m very much letting pianohacker and khall take the reins on this. we’ve currently got 1200 issuingrule lines, so they have a good test case for lots of rules already. 20:38:31 * andreashm would like that too 20:38:32 <khall> cait: yes, I can do that 20:38:53 <andreashm> hbraum: ouch 20:38:54 <hbraum> and looking at the current mockup, a second screen overview would be helpful, I agree. 20:38:55 <cait> #action khall asked nicely to add another mock-up for an overview kind of page 20:38:56 <bag> yeah 1200 lines is crazy 20:39:19 <khall> The first step is to change the internals without changing the externals. If anyone has an issue with the proposed schema please let us know asap 20:39:53 <cait> it will be a bit harder to get a nice excel sheet out :) 20:40:04 <cait> that's what we do now - because you can make it sortable 20:40:11 <cait> if there is no longer a need for it... that might be not too bad 20:40:16 <khall> this would be a table too, so very sortable 20:40:23 <rangi> first thing id do is create a script where you can pass a itemtype, categorycode and branch, and get back what the rule applied would be 20:40:27 <rangi> then you can change the internals 20:40:30 <rangi> run that again 20:40:37 <rangi> and prove it hasn't suddenly changed 20:40:42 <khall> rangi: agreed, unit tests ++ 20:41:21 <barton> khall: I've got most of that written. 20:41:26 <rangi> that script could then have a web frontend put on it later, so librarians could choose from a drop down, and see what rule would be applied .. rather than having to read everything 20:41:46 <rangi> why was this book issued for 4 weeks .. oh it used this rule 20:41:50 <khall> rangi: you're reading my mind ; ) We've discussed that idea 20:41:55 <cait> #idea have a script that gives you the circ conditions for branch, itemtype and patron category entered 20:42:00 <rangi> 70% of support queuries gone :) 20:42:04 <khall> I think that should definitely be built in 20:42:17 <bag> more time to signoff!!! 20:42:41 <Joubu> bag: heh, we have found what you wanted 20:42:44 <hbraum> rangi ha! no kidding. 20:43:07 <barton> In design discussions, we talked about making the lookup available on the circ page too, just for reference. 20:43:12 <cait> hbraum: nekls++ btw for sponsoring - much needed 20:43:26 <cait> for libraries with only 150 and less rules too :) 20:43:56 <cait> ok, any more ideas or can we move on? 20:44:05 <cait> full agenda tonight, but i don't want to rush youtoo much :) 20:44:12 <khall> going once 20:44:17 <hbraum> yw! the overall development scope of the project will also help branch specific circ-related rules get applied through this, right khall? 20:44:36 <khall> hbraum: yes! 20:44:57 <cait> i'd lke to move up a topic - Kohacon16 20:44:58 <khall> it will hopefully be a grand unification theory for Koha circ rules 20:45:10 <khall> agreed, let's move on 20:45:21 <cait> #topic KohaCon16 - Greece 20:45:23 <bag> thanks khall 20:45:30 <cait> ikourmou? 20:45:39 <ikourmou> i'm here! 20:45:48 <cait> I think we are all curious for an update :) 20:46:11 <wizzyrea> #info Liz Rea, Catalyst 20:46:16 <ikourmou> we are working on the ocnference, we started with forming a committee 20:46:23 <ikourmou> the dates are set 20:46:31 <ikourmou> from 30th of may 20:46:36 <davidnind> #info David Nind, Wellington, NZ 20:46:38 <ikourmou> to 4th of june 20:46:57 <cait> #info dates are set - may 30 - june 4 20:47:12 <ikourmou> 3 first days of presentations, then a day off for a roadtrip for sightseeing 20:47:25 <ikourmou> and then teo days for the hackfest 20:47:37 <ikourmou> the venue is already booked 20:47:57 <ikourmou> and the webpage for the Kohacon16 will be live next week 20:48:24 <ikourmou> I would like to ask you people for a couple of things... 20:48:43 <JesseM> ikourmou++ 20:48:47 <ikourmou> there will be a call for presentations i suppose 20:49:14 <ikourmou> what is the best way to deal with it? 20:49:29 <cait> hm you could look at how it was done the last years maybe 20:49:40 <cait> i think probably put it on the website, but alos send to the mailing lists 20:49:50 <ikourmou> do we have to specify subjects in advance? 20:49:55 <rangi> nope 20:50:04 <rangi> apart from, should be Koha related :) 20:50:26 <cait> i think you can probably keep it simple :) 20:50:36 <rangi> it's nice to get as many local presentations as you can too 20:50:51 <ikourmou> ok, there are some thoughts on presentation subjects from the organising team here 20:51:37 <ikourmou> aso, when would we start accepting registrations? 20:51:59 <cait> I think getting out the cfp would be highest prio now 20:52:08 <cait> some people onl yget funding for travel if they get to speak 20:52:10 <cait> or it's easier for them 20:52:45 <cait> and also with an idea about the program, more people might register - not sure 20:52:48 <ikourmou> ok, it could be done by next week 20:53:19 <rangi> often it makes it easier for people to get funding 20:53:24 <ikourmou> you mean a more specific program than i mentioned above, i suppose 20:53:27 <rangi> to attend 20:53:48 <rangi> if they can say "theres a presentation about linked data and Koha .. we want to do that" to their boss ;) 20:53:59 <rangi> if that makes sense 20:54:18 <ikourmou> ok, i understand 20:54:23 <cait> ikourmou: i think if you have some specific topics oyu'd like to get presntations about you could put that in the cfp, but laeave it open for other ideas as well? 20:54:50 <ikourmou> yes, that's what we were thinking 20:55:01 <rangi> cool 20:55:08 <cait> cool :) 20:55:28 <BobB> re the conference dates, an early announcement to the mailing list is always good - announce early and announce often 20:55:40 <drojf1> ikourmou: i think it is not uncommon to get a few people from the community to help decide on the presentations once the call for papers is over. if you need help with that feel free to ask 20:56:05 <ikourmou> BobB: already sent to koha mailing list and to koha news 20:56:24 <BobB> keep doing it, just sayin' 20:56:51 <ikourmou> BobB: will do again with the webpage address, thx 20:57:02 <BobB> yes, very good 20:57:18 <wizzyrea> ikourmou: please let me know when you have stuff for the community kohacon16 page 20:57:29 <ikourmou> thanks, drojf1, that was my next question 20:57:44 <wizzyrea> stuff = a url, specific copy you'd like there 20:57:50 <wizzyrea> otherwise you're leaving it up to me :) 20:58:35 <ikourmou> and another question: 20:59:09 <ikourmou> if we get to many proposals for presentations, what is the best way to choose? 20:59:22 <ikourmou> or should we try to fit them all to the schedule? 20:59:41 <rangi> that's up to you 20:59:56 <rangi> but one question to ask is, are you definitely coming 21:00:03 <rangi> when i ran kohacon10 21:00:14 <rangi> we got a lot of proposals, then a lot couldn't come 21:00:26 <rangi> so it's easy to drop those ones out 21:00:51 <ikourmou> ok, i will note this - hadn't thought of it :-) 21:00:52 <drojf1> you may get a lot of papers from a single institution, who you could ask to share slots. if you got the same topic covered by a library and a support provider, choose the library 21:00:54 <bag> magnuse: knuckles 21:00:57 <rangi> after that, we had enough :) 21:01:31 <drojf1> or make them collaborate ;) 21:01:52 <BobB> if you have the capacity, you can run parallel sessions too 21:02:10 <rangi> which is kinda horrible imho 21:02:11 <rangi> :) 21:02:33 <rangi> i think single track conferences are so so so much better than multi track 21:02:34 <irma> that would not be my choice ... parallel sessions 21:02:38 <cait> yeah... having to pick... aah 21:02:39 <fredericd> #info Frédéric Demians, Tamil 21:02:39 <cait> :) 21:02:40 <magnuse> bag: HI 21:02:41 <wahanui> que tal, magnuse 21:03:08 <rangi> however, sometimes you can ask if someone would rather present as part of the hackfest 21:03:09 <cait> having some kind of discussion/roundtable thing or question and answers is also good to fill slots 21:03:20 <rangi> having said all this .. it's never been a problem in the past 21:03:27 <irma> single track conferences ++ 21:03:32 <cait> maybe worry, once the papers come in :) 21:03:36 <rangi> and having too many presentations will be a new and exciting problem to solve :) 21:03:45 <cait> oh, and set a deadline - i think i tmakes people actually write abstracts 21:03:58 <cait> can still extend if necessary 21:04:00 <ikourmou> we were thinking of placing "introductory" presentations in the morning sessions, leaving the more specialised ones for the afternoon 21:04:19 <rangi> that makes sense to me 21:04:48 <ikourmou> another question: 21:04:49 <drojf1> sleeping in ++ 21:04:56 <ikourmou> Is there something we should take care of, regarding travel arrangements? 21:05:06 <magnuse> #info Magnus Enger, Libriotech, Norway 21:05:09 <ikourmou> especially for people oustide the EU? 21:05:22 <rangi> I have always found a page, that lists airports close 21:05:23 <BobB> the conference should be accessible for librarians and newbies; very technical presentations can be left to the hackfest 21:05:36 <rangi> really helpful 21:05:43 <rangi> and maybe a link to VISA requirements etc 21:05:55 <rangi> also, for some people they make ask you for an invitation letter 21:05:56 <wizzyrea> does greece ... yeah that 21:06:07 <BobB> ikourmou I would like a scholarship to attend the conference please, $5k should do it :) 21:06:22 <rangi> so having a letter you can sign and scan is handy too 21:06:34 <rangi> (it helps with some people getting a VISA) 21:06:43 <ikourmou> BobB: I 'll see what we can do :) 21:07:16 <BobB> thanks ikourmou, I will wait patiently 21:07:43 <ikourmou> ok, noted (VISA info and invitation letter). thanks 21:08:06 <cait> i forgot to add #info... but curious people wil read full minutes i hope 21:08:21 <cait> #info forgot to add more infos... lots of KohaCon infos in full meeting logs 21:08:35 <BobB> cait +1 21:09:00 <cait> ikourmou: any more questions? or questions for ikourmou? 21:09:05 <rangi> http://kohacon15.projektlinkkonsult.com/getting-to-ibadan/ <-- a page like that is handy 21:09:31 <ikourmou> rangi: yes, i've seen that 21:09:51 <Joubu> Are there good beers in Greece? 21:10:04 <rangi> heh 21:10:19 <rangi> http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Kohacon13/Social <--- i brought my own 21:10:20 <wizzyrea> that's probably the most important question 21:10:29 <ikourmou> is there anything that you would like sto stress out in general? especially you people that already organised a conference before... 21:10:31 <rangi> but pages like that on the wiki are good to create too, also 21:10:40 <rangi> http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Kohacon13/Arrivals 21:11:03 <ikourmou> Jobu: a lot of microbreweries, i hope you will find interesting 21:11:12 <Joubu> rangi: I will try to bring them! 21:11:51 <Joubu> ikourmou: great :) 21:12:04 <cait> #info there are lots of microbreweries in Greece 21:12:18 <bag> I’m sold can we have kohacon next week? 21:12:21 <cait> best advertising for kohacon... 21:12:26 <cait> heh 21:12:28 <cait> i am all fo rit 21:12:33 <cait> but i think we need to move on 21:12:58 <ikourmou> ok, thank you people for the advice :) 21:13:05 <cait> #topic Update from the International Fund Committee 21:13:12 <bag> not much besides - we tried to put together a meeting - but with holidays we weren’t able to find one 21:13:13 <bag> still working on the next meeting 21:13:18 <ikourmou> hope to see you in Greece! 21:13:22 <cait> ikourmou: please get in contact if we can help in any wa 21:13:23 <cait> y 21:13:24 <bag> thanks ikourmou 21:13:53 <cait> #info looking for dates for the next meeting 21:13:58 <BobB> there are two things to do re fundraising 21:14:06 <BobB> organise a meeting 21:14:27 <BobB> and write rules for the HLT Grants committee - Galen and I are to do that 21:15:01 <BobB> bag do you have any info on how much has been raised at HLT? I suspect not a lot yet? 21:15:20 <cait> #info Galen and BobBto write rules for the HLT Grants committee 21:15:24 <bag> I don’t have that - but I can ask Jo and will report for the next meeting 21:15:47 <cait> #action bag to ask how much has been raised so far 21:15:54 <cait> and report... 21:15:55 <wahanui> i guess report is for Overdues that we want to mail out from the library, not use peoples' emails. It needs to show the patrons' information and just the items that are overdue all on a single page. Each page needs to have one patron only. Can anyone help me with this? 21:15:55 <BobB> cool, I'll have another go at scheduling a meeting 21:16:23 <BobB> wahanui, read the manual 21:16:24 <wahanui> BobB: i'm not following you... 21:16:35 <pianohacker> wahanui: forget report 21:16:35 <wahanui> pianohacker: I forgot report 21:16:46 <cait> #action BobB to schedule the meeting 21:16:54 <cait> any questions? 21:16:57 <pianohacker> also hi y'all 21:17:38 <cait> moving on :) 21:17:44 <cait> #topic Let's Encrypt 21:17:57 <drojf1> we are running a little late already, i'm trying to make this short. i think it would be good to support letsencrypt as soon as possible 21:18:06 <drojf1> gmcharlt introduced me to eric hellman who is going to look into letsencrypt adoption by library projects for the library freedom project, they are pretty interested in this too 21:18:17 <cait> just a warning - if no protests i'd like to move the kohacon voting discussion nd the INSTALL.debian topics to the next meeting 21:18:23 <drojf1> i basically have two questions: 1) it's only debian script changes, can we have it in stable before 3.24 (when it's tested ok)? 2) should it become default eventually, or would that be considered antifeatureish? 21:18:54 <cait> drojf1: does it have any new dependencies? 21:19:05 <cait> i think that hs been the major blocker for backporting - or one of them currently 21:19:11 <drojf1> not in debian yet, beuase there is no package 21:19:36 * magnuse would vote for getting it into 3.22.x 21:19:47 <drojf1> atm you need to checkout from git. i dont know how long this will take until its in the repo 21:20:04 <drojf1> the bug is 15303, i added a new patch today and it can be tested (please) 21:20:12 <wizzyrea> +1 to make it very easy to SSL 21:20:17 <drojf1> i will open another for koha-letsencrypt to do it with existing installations 21:20:48 <drojf1> but in the long run i think it would be good to have this as a default (which can be overidden of course) 21:21:30 <magnuse> +1 to make it default 21:21:47 <cait> maybe: backport but make it optional 21:21:58 <cait> and think about default for next release? 21:22:13 <davidnind> I think it needs to be optional, for those behind firewalls 21:22:16 <drojf1> i would propose: backport, as optional. and label it experimental maybe, because you need to checkot the client yourself and stuff 21:22:23 <rangi> yeah 21:22:28 <cait> davidnind: i think it would always be - just thinking about the default setting 21:22:31 <magnuse> make it easy to enable for existing sites and default for new sites 21:22:37 <cait> i think i didn't phrase it right 21:22:40 <drojf1> oh. it should always be optional! 21:22:51 <drojf1> a default an be overridden of course 21:22:58 <cait> i meant non-default - not optional :) 21:23:01 <drojf1> it wont work for everyone, that is for sure 21:23:17 <drojf1> and some people will use their own certs, etc 21:24:18 <drojf1> but if we backport it now we also have more testers and can fix stuff before it may be a default 21:24:42 <drojf1> it's not interfering with koha codebase apart from the debian scripts 21:24:43 <cait> jajm is not here tonight, so we can't reall ymake a decision i think 21:24:56 <drojf1> true 21:25:05 <cait> but we can get an idea about what poeple tend to maybe 21:25:11 <cait> is someone against backporting? 21:25:34 <cait> or has questions? doubts? 21:25:47 <rangi> id wait until its packaged, it's kinda moot at this point ;) 21:26:04 <rangi> (ie making a dependency, it needs to be debian packaged before we could that anyway) 21:26:15 <Joubu> I'll read the patch first :) 21:26:21 <rangi> but certainly showing how to install it with Koha, is a great idea 21:26:26 <wizzyrea> ^ 21:26:59 <cait> #link http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15303 21:27:00 <huginn`> 04Bug 15303: enhancement, P5 - low, ---, mirko, Needs Signoff , Letsencrypt option for Debian package installations 21:27:35 <drojf1> i'll try to find out about the package situation 21:28:02 <rangi> https://obs.library.workbuffer.org/ <-- uses letsencrypt fwiw 21:28:05 <cait> btw drojf++ 21:28:09 <rangi> thats my kids school 21:28:16 <rangi> yep 21:28:18 <magnuse> yeah drojf++ 21:28:19 <rangi> drojf++ 21:28:28 <indradg> +1 for backporting 21:29:18 <cait> #info please help testing the patches for Letsencrypt on bug 15303 21:29:19 <huginn`> 04Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15303 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, mirko, Needs Signoff , Letsencrypt option for Debian package installations 21:29:29 <cait> any more questions? 21:29:32 <drojf1> ok that sabout it for now 21:29:41 <drojf1> that's about 21:30:02 <cait> are people ok with wrapping it up for today? 21:30:13 <rangi> yep 21:30:14 <davidnind> yep 21:30:25 <drojf1> +1 21:30:27 <BobB> yes 21:30:32 <Colinc> yep 21:30:40 <cait> we didn't cover INSTALL.debian and KohaCon17, KohaCon voting - so pushing those to next time 21:30:54 <cait> #topic Next meeting 21:31:02 <drojf1> we will push the voring stuff until the next vote :P 21:31:11 <drojf1> *voting 21:31:20 <cait> #info INSTALL.debian, KohaCon17, and KohaCon voting mechanism are postponed to the next meeting 21:31:34 <cait> drojf1: or first on agenda next time :) 21:31:45 <cait> what about february 3rd? 21:32:09 <drojf1> sounds good to me (3rd) 21:32:13 <davidnind> +1 21:32:16 <magnuse> +1 21:32:19 <cait> what time? 21:32:19 <wahanui> i think time is like a big ball of wibbly wobbly... time-y wimey... stuff. or generously donated to giving support in #koha but if you need more help faster than we can give it try http://koha-community.org/support/paid/ 21:32:29 <Colinc> +1 21:32:36 <rangi> +1 21:32:53 <cait> 10 UTC? 21:32:54 <wahanui> rumour has it 10 UTC is a good time, but is very early on east coast USA 21:33:03 <magnuse> +1 21:33:14 <drojf1> +1 21:33:40 <cait> #agreed Next IRC meeting will be on February 3, 10 UTC 21:33:49 <cait> #endmeeting